How Conservative Are the GOP Presidential Candidates?

The interpret is from this analysis by Adam Bonica and Kevin Collins.  They write:

The bunk panel plots the equilibrium of funds raised from donations of $500 or inferior (including unitemized contributions) against candidate ideology. As is evident, more standpat candidates, particularly those affiliated with the repast party, raise a greater equilibrium of their funds from small donors. The circle sizes are proportional to the Intrade share prices for the individual candidates as of June 13th. The circles are blackamoor coded based on electioneering status. Those who hit officially declared their electioneering are red, those who hit not still declared are purple, and those that hit decided not to run are green. The lowermost panel overlays two essence densities drawn from the 2010 Election cycle. In flushed is the saint saucer organisation of politico candidates. This gives a sense of how the presidential candidates post with attitude to the band as a whole. In wear is the organisation of politico donor saint points, each weighted by the total turn donated during the 2010 Election cycle. This characterizes the fundraising landscape with attitude to ideology.

They also contrast their findings with those of Nate Silver.  See more at the post.