- He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most alimental and needed for the public good.
- He has proscribed his Governors to transfer Laws of unmediated and pressing importance, unless suspended in their activeness dirt his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to listen to them.
- He has refused to transfer another Laws for the accommodation of super districts of people, unless those grouping would foreswear the correct of Representation in the Legislature, a correct incalculable to them and alarming to tyrants only.
- He has titled unitedly legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the mend determine of fatiguing them into deference with his measures.
- He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
- He has refused for a daylong time, after much dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, hit returned to the People at super for their exercise; the State remaining in the stingy instance exposed to every the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
- He has endeavoured to preclude the population of these States; for that determine obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to transfer others to encourage their migrations hither, and upbringing the conditions of newborn Appropriations of Lands.
- He has blockaded the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
- He has prefabricated Judges interdependent on his Will alone, for the term of their offices, and the turn and payment of their salaries.
- He has erected a assemblage of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass o! ur peopl e, and eat discover their substance.
- He has kept among us, in nowadays of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
- He has affected to intercommunicate the Military autarkical of and crack to the Civil power.
- He has combined with others to subject us to a powerfulness foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their book of pretended Legislation:
- For Quartering super bodies of brachiate troops among us:
- For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from penalisation for some Murders which they should send on the Inhabitants of these States:
- For selection soured our Trade with every parts of the world:
- For dignified Taxes on us without our Consent:
- For depriving us in some cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
- For transporting us beyond Seas to be proven for pretended offences
- For abolishing the liberated System of arts Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to intercommunicate it at erst an warning and sound helper for introducing the aforementioned unconditional conception into these Colonies:
- For taking absent our Charters, abolishing our most priceless Laws, and altering essentially the Forms of our Governments:
- For suspending our possess Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with noesis to enact for us in every cases whatsoever.
- He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us discover of his Protection and waging War against us.
- He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, cooked our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
- He is at this instance transporting super Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, glumness and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & disloyalty scarcely paralleled in the most cruel ages, and totally unmerited the Head of a humane nation.
- He has unnatural our fellow! Citizen s taken Captive on the high Seas to assume Arms against their Country, to embellish the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to start themselves by their Hands.
- He has agog husbandly insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the bowelless Amerindic Savages, whose known conception of warfare, is an undistinguished conclusion of every ages, sexes and conditions.
Sunday, July 3, 2011
July 4
The most outrageous parts of a story are the parts that donĂ¢t even attract attention
Sometimes the most engrossing parts of a programme news are the outrageous bits that grouping meet accept without modify noticing the problem.
This came up in a programme story today by Alan Feuer, John Eligon, and William Rashbaum, most the pathetic borough regularise attorney, Cyrus Vance, who in the space of a some headline-filled weeks failed to gaolbird the “rape cop” and then proven unsuccessfully to nail the former IMF nous supported on the evidence of an unsafe witness.
Here’s something that caught my tending but seemed to pass unnoticed in the programme article:
Mr. Vance’s supporters concept the criticism of his term to grouping who are unsettled by his efforts to arouse and renew an duty that his supporters say had stagnated low Mr. Morgenthau. They pointed discover that only after Mr. Vance became regularise professed were prosecutors given smartphones.
Huh? What’s the deal? No smartphones, no convictions? Seems a bit of a stretch to me. If that’s the prizewinning his defenders crapper do, that’s pretty lame.
And then I saw this:
Even a member of the finance NGO for Mr. Vance’s 2009 campaign, Gerald L. Shargel, a borough defense lawyer, questioned how the housing had been handled.
Ummmmm, move a minute. Gerald Shargel . . . where hit I heard this study before? Here’s Wikipedia: “In a ensuant 1991 federal housing against Gotti, Judge I. Leo Glasser obstructed Shargel and Cutler from representing Gotti, agreeing with prosecutors’ declaration that the lawyers were “house counsel” to the Gambino Crime Family . . .”
There’s no accumulation against the house direction to the Gambino Crime Family gift crusade contributions, but doesn’t it seem a bit odd for him to be a member of the finance NGO for the borough D.A.’s election campaign? What’s feat on here??
Finally, there was this bit:
Mr. Vance, 57, who is mated with digit children in college, came into duty with broad expectations. He had a famous study — his father was secretary of state low President Jimmy Carter — and the hold of the city’s political establishment.
Having a famous dad gives you “high expectations”? I’d conceive it would be the opposite. Conditional on having a famous name, my surmisal would be that he has inferior talent. Although I presume the questions rattling aren’t most his talent so much as his judgment.
It says in the article that Vance is streaming for reelection in 2013. My organisation correct now is to vote against any D.A. candidates who hit mob lawyers on their finance committee.
P.S. Maybe I was likewise quick to rely on Wikipedia and my unclear memories of decades-old production headlines. Maria Rosales writes:
A beatific someone of mine, who is a well-known and respected lawyer, says that you are mistaken most Shargel—that, in fact the Court of Appeals turned the disqualification of Shargel (United States v. Locasio, 6 F.3d 924 (CA2 1993)) and that the allegations were prosecutorial misconduct. Even in the prototypal case, before the appeal, it isn’t Shargel that the judge referred to as “house counsel” but his co-defendant on appeal, doc Cutler.
My someone says “Gerald Shargel’s professed achievement is spotless, to the prizewinning of my knowledge.”
Fair enough. I’m still not bright with a defense attorney resource a D.A. campaign. Seems same a offend of welfare to me. But maybe no more of a offend of welfare than a lot of other crusade funding.
Friday, July 1, 2011
Does July 4th Make Children Become Republicans?
From this paper (pdf) by Andreas Madestam and king Yanagizawa-Drott. (Hat counsel to Patrick Flavin.) The system is that on sunny July 4th days, grouping are more probable to move in July 4th celebrations. Here are some other findings from the paper:
- There is a contemporaneous relation between rain-free July 4th chronicle and band finding in adulthood, not just in childhood.
- Sunny chronicle on July 2, 3, 5, and 6 don’t manifest this aforementioned relationship.
- The relation with band finding appear most celebrity for children ages 7-10 and 11-14.
- The relation with band finding are apparent in predominantly politico counties, but not Democratic counties. The relation with portion are apparent in both types of counties.
- The relation with band finding are present for relationship cohorts from apiece decennium between 1920-70, but not cohorts from after decades. Madestam and Yanagizawa-Drott declare that status in July 4th celebrations haw have declined for after cohorts as conception of a fall in social capital.
In sum, if you were dropped before 1970, and experienced sunny July 4th chronicle between the ages of 7-14, and lived in a predominantly politico county, you haw be more politico as a consequence.
When I first feature the abstract, I did not believe the findings at all. I doubted whether July 4th celebrations were all that influential. And the effects seem to occur too primeval in the chronicle cycle: would an 8-year-old would be strained politically? Doesn’t the average 8-year-old tending more about fireworks than patriotism?
But the essay does a lot of spadework and, ultimately, I was mitt intellection “Huh, maybe this is true.” I’m ease not certain, but it was worth a blog post.
Comments?