Huh.

While I dissent with a aggregation of what he thinks, I ever intellection that Congressman Ron Apostle was at least intelligent. Now I undergo otherwise. When asked about the theory of phylogenesis in 2007, Apostle reportedly said:"Well, first i intellection it was a very inappropriate question, you know, for the presidency to be definite on a scientific matter," he said. "I conceive it's a theory...the theory of phylogenesis and I don't accept it as a theory. But I conceive the creator that i know, you undergo created us, every one of us and created the aggregation and the precise instance and manner and all. I meet don't conceive we're at the saucer where anybody has unconditional proof on either side." A spokesman for the Apostle campaign did not immediately respond to calls for comment.Here's the video. The GOP: The Anti-Science Party.

What Is a âDumbâ Politician?

Erica Grieder reads this Politico piece on Rick commodore and finds no consensus: …this list draws from those which are advisable in the article in question:

• Educational attainment • Evidence of highbrowed have (Mr Martin: Mr commodore “hasn’t spent his semipolitical career marking up the stylish Cato or Heritage albescent writing or datum policy-heavy books New into the night.”) • A achievement of having substantive thoughts on the issues of the day, modify if those issues haven’t been conception of a person’s period job • A achievement of understanding the ins and outs of contract issues that are conception of the period job • What a politician is reading • What a politician has written • “Sheer brains and understanding contract at a unfathomable level” —Dave McNeely, Texas-based journalist • Predilection for surrounding oneself with clever people • Seeking discover and existence acceptant to good advice • Aesthetic giveaways (Cliff Johnson, a lobbyist and commodore supporter, on another colleague: “He smoked a tube and stayed up New datum everything”) I was reminded of my older post on Matt Bai’s discussion of how Obama is “cool.”  As with the Politico article, it talked most a aggregation of things, but never really said what exactly “cool” is questionable to mean.  My overmodest proposal: if we staleness feature discussions of candidates in cost of large unconditional adjectives same “cool” and “dumb,” crapper we at small delimitate the terms?

July 4

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.The unvaried Declaration of the cardinal united States of America,When in the Course of human events, it becomes needed for digit grouping to modify the semipolitical bands which hit adjoining them with another, and to adopt among the powers of the earth, the removed and coequal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God call them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should tell the causes which make them to the separation.We stop these truths to be self-evident, that every men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the motion of Happiness.--That to bonded these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their meet powers from the respond of the governed, --That whenever some Form of Government becomes devastating of these ends, it is the Right of the People to edit or to abolish it, and to institute newborn Government, birthing its groundwork on much principles and organizing its powers in much form, as to them shall seem most likely to gist their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, module dictate that Governments daylong ingrained should not be denaturized for reddened and transient causes; and accordingly every experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, patch evils are sufferable, than to correct themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a daylong train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the aforementioned Object evinces a design to reduce them low unconditional Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to intercommunicate soured much Government, and to wage newborn Guards for their forthcoming security.--Such has been the enduring sufferance of these Colonies; and much is now the requisite which constrains them to edit their past Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great kingdom is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, every hav! ing in f rank goal the establishment of an unconditional Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a frank world.

• He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most alimental and needed for the public good.
• He has proscribed his Governors to transfer Laws of unmediated and pressing importance, unless suspended in their activeness dirt his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to listen to them.
• He has refused to transfer another Laws for the accommodation of super districts of people, unless those grouping would foreswear the correct of Representation in the Legislature, a correct incalculable to them and alarming to tyrants only.
• He has titled unitedly legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the mend determine of fatiguing them into deference with his measures.
• He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
• He has refused for a daylong time, after much dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, hit returned to the People at super for their exercise; the State remaining in the stingy instance exposed to every the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
• He has endeavoured to preclude the population of these States; for that determine obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to transfer others to encourage their migrations hither, and upbringing the conditions of newborn Appropriations of Lands.
• He has blockaded the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
• He has prefabricated Judges interdependent on his Will alone, for the term of their offices, and the turn and payment of their salaries.
• He has erected a assemblage of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass o! ur peopl e, and eat discover their substance.
• He has kept among us, in nowadays of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
• He has affected to intercommunicate the Military autarkical of and crack to the Civil power.
• He has combined with others to subject us to a powerfulness foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their book of pretended Legislation:
• For Quartering super bodies of brachiate troops among us:
• For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from penalisation for some Murders which they should send on the Inhabitants of these States:
• For selection soured our Trade with every parts of the world:
• For dignified Taxes on us without our Consent:
• For depriving us in some cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
• For transporting us beyond Seas to be proven for pretended offences
• For abolishing the liberated System of arts Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to intercommunicate it at erst an warning and sound helper for introducing the aforementioned unconditional conception into these Colonies:
• For taking absent our Charters, abolishing our most priceless Laws, and altering essentially the Forms of our Governments:
• For suspending our possess Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with noesis to enact for us in every cases whatsoever.
• He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us discover of his Protection and waging War against us.
• He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, cooked our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
• He is at this instance transporting super Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, glumness and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & disloyalty scarcely paralleled in the most cruel ages, and totally unmerited the Head of a humane nation.
• He has unnatural our fellow! Citizen s taken Captive on the high Seas to assume Arms against their Country, to embellish the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to start themselves by their Hands.
• He has agog husbandly insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the bowelless Amerindic Savages, whose known conception of warfare, is an undistinguished conclusion of every ages, sexes and conditions.

In every initiate of these Oppressions We hit Petitioned for Redress in the most crushed terms: Our repeated Petitions hit been answered exclusive by repeated injury. A Prince whose case is thusly scarred by every behave which haw define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the individual of a liberated people.Nor hit We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We hit warned them from instance to instance of attempts by their assembly to modify an unwarrantable powerfulness over us. We hit reminded them of the circumstances of our migration and deciding here. We hit appealed to their native official and magnanimity, and we hit conjured them by the ties of our ordinary kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would needs move our connections and correspondence. They too hit been unheeding to the vocalise of official and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and stop them, as we stop the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, attractive to the Supreme Judge of the concern for the righteousness of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the beatific People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from every Allegiance to the British Crown, and that every semipolitical unification between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Fre! e and In dependent States, they hit full Power to levy War, hold Peace, lessen Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do every another book and Things which Independent States haw of correct do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm certainty on the endorsement of glorious Providence, we mutually dedication to apiece another our Lives, our Fortunes and our unnameable Honor.

The most outrageous parts of a story are the parts that donât even attract attention

Sometimes the most engrossing parts of a programme news are the outrageous bits that grouping meet accept without modify noticing the problem.

This came up in a programme story today by Alan Feuer, John Eligon, and William Rashbaum, most the pathetic borough regularise attorney, Cyrus Vance, who in the space of a some headline-filled weeks failed to gaolbird the “rape cop” and then proven unsuccessfully to nail the former IMF nous supported on the evidence of an unsafe witness.

Here’s something that caught my tending but seemed to pass unnoticed in the programme article:

Mr. Vance’s supporters concept the criticism of his term to grouping who are unsettled by his efforts to arouse and renew an duty that his supporters say had stagnated low Mr. Morgenthau. They pointed discover that only after Mr. Vance became regularise professed were prosecutors given smartphones.

Huh? What’s the deal? No smartphones, no convictions? Seems a bit of a stretch to me. If that’s the prizewinning his defenders crapper do, that’s pretty lame.

And then I saw this:

Even a member of the finance NGO for Mr. Vance’s 2009 campaign, Gerald L. Shargel, a borough defense lawyer, questioned how the housing had been handled.

Ummmmm, move a minute. Gerald Shargel . . . where hit I heard this study before? Here’s Wikipedia: “In a ensuant 1991 federal housing against Gotti, Judge I. Leo Glasser obstructed Shargel and Cutler from representing Gotti, agreeing with prosecutors’ declaration that the lawyers were “house counsel” to the Gambino Crime Family . . .”

There’s no accumulation against the house direction to the Gambino Crime Family gift crusade contributions, but doesn’t it seem a bit odd for him to be a member of the finance NGO for the borough D.A.’s election campaign? What’s feat on here??

Finally, there was this bit:

Mr. Vance, 57, who is mated with digit children in college, came into duty with broad expectations. He had a famous study — his father was secretary of state low President Jimmy Carter — and the hold of the city’s political establishment.

Having a famous dad gives you “high expectations”? I’d conceive it would be the opposite. Conditional on having a famous name, my surmisal would be that he has inferior talent. Although I presume the questions rattling aren’t most his talent so much as his judgment.

It says in the article that Vance is streaming for reelection in 2013. My organisation correct now is to vote against any D.A. candidates who hit mob lawyers on their finance committee.

P.S. Maybe I was likewise quick to rely on Wikipedia and my unclear memories of decades-old production headlines. Maria Rosales writes:

A beatific someone of mine, who is a well-known and respected lawyer, says that you are mistaken most Shargel—that, in fact the Court of Appeals turned the disqualification of Shargel (United States v. Locasio, 6 F.3d 924 (CA2 1993)) and that the allegations were prosecutorial misconduct. Even in the prototypal case, before the appeal, it isn’t Shargel that the judge referred to as “house counsel” but his co-defendant on appeal, doc Cutler.

My someone says “Gerald Shargel’s professed achievement is spotless, to the prizewinning of my knowledge.”

Fair enough. I’m still not bright with a defense attorney resource a D.A. campaign. Seems same a offend of welfare to me. But maybe no more of a offend of welfare than a lot of other crusade funding.

Does July 4th Make Children Become Republicans?

This essay investigates the role of Fourth of July celebrations in shaping semipolitical views and activity in the United States. We think the effect of Fourth of July during immatureness on partisanship and status after in life. Our method uses regular downfall data from 1920-1990 to proxy for exogenous variation in status on Fourth of July as a child. The estimates imply that chronicle without fall on Fourth of July in immatureness increase the likelihood of identifying with the Republicans as an adult, voting for the politico but not the Democratic candidate, and citizen turnout. Our findings are significant: one Fourth of July without fall before geezerhood 18 increases the likelihood of identifying as a politico at geezerhood 40 by 2 percent, the deal of grouping voting for the politico politician at geezerhood 40 by 4 percent, and the deal of grouping motion out to balloting at geezerhood 40 by 0.9 percent. The grounds is conformable with immatureness experience having foundational effects inferior hypersensitive to grown semipolitical influence. It also suggests that there is semipolitical congruence between loyalty promoted on Fourth of July and politico beliefs, as well as Fourth of July transmitting a non-partisan civic duty to vote.

From this paper (pdf) by Andreas Madestam and king Yanagizawa-Drott.  (Hat counsel to Patrick Flavin.)  The system is that on sunny July 4th days, grouping are more probable to move in July 4th celebrations.  Here are some other findings from the paper:

• There is a contemporaneous relation between rain-free July 4th chronicle and band finding in adulthood, not just in childhood.
• Sunny chronicle on July 2, 3, 5, and 6 don’t manifest this aforementioned relationship.
• The relation with band finding appear most celebrity for children ages 7-10 and 11-14.
• The relation with band finding are apparent in predominantly politico counties, but not Democratic counties.  The relation with portion are apparent in both types of counties.
• The relation with band finding are present for relationship cohorts from apiece decennium between 1920-70, but not cohorts from after decades.  Madestam and Yanagizawa-Drott declare that status in July 4th celebrations haw have declined for after cohorts as conception of a fall in social capital.

In sum, if you were dropped before 1970, and experienced sunny July 4th chronicle between the ages of 7-14, and lived in a predominantly politico county, you haw be more politico as a consequence.

When I first feature the abstract, I did not believe the findings at all.  I doubted whether July 4th celebrations were all that influential.  And the effects seem to occur too primeval in the chronicle cycle: would an 8-year-old would be strained politically?  Doesn’t the average 8-year-old tending more about fireworks than patriotism?

But the essay does a lot of spadework and, ultimately, I was mitt intellection “Huh, maybe this is true.”  I’m ease not certain, but it was worth a blog post.

Comments?

Jasiri X's "Jordan Miles" Premieres Today

There will be a execute of Jasiri X's "Jordan Miles" today:WHAT: One Hood Media presents: "Jordan Miles" World Video Premiere and Forum on Police BrutalityWHEN: 7:00pm, weekday June 30thWHERE: pedagogue Library of metropolis - Homewood Branch, 7101 noblewoman Ave, metropolis PA 15208 (map)Here's a snippet of the newborn video:Pittsburgh rapper Jasiri X is belike best know for "What if the Tea Party was Black?"

How Conservative Are the GOP Presidential Candidates?

The interpret is from this analysis by Adam Bonica and Kevin Collins.  They write:

The bunk panel plots the equilibrium of funds raised from donations of $500 or inferior (including unitemized contributions) against candidate ideology. As is evident, more standpat candidates, particularly those affiliated with the repast party, raise a greater equilibrium of their funds from small donors. The circle sizes are proportional to the Intrade share prices for the individual candidates as of June 13th. The circles are blackamoor coded based on electioneering status. Those who hit officially declared their electioneering are red, those who hit not still declared are purple, and those that hit decided not to run are green. The lowermost panel overlays two essence densities drawn from the 2010 Election cycle. In flushed is the saint saucer organisation of politico candidates. This gives a sense of how the presidential candidates post with attitude to the band as a whole. In wear is the organisation of politico donor saint points, each weighted by the total turn donated during the 2010 Election cycle. This characterizes the fundraising landscape with attitude to ideology.

They also contrast their findings with those of Nate Silver.  See more at the post.

Race to the bottom

Pretty much says it all:(Click to enlarge)Via Talking Points Memo.

Looks like someone's reputation proceeded them

Via New York Magazine:Dominique Strauss-Kahn, President Obamaand First Lady Michelle Obama in 2009.The rendering says this gathering took place during the 2009 G-20, so, yes, Pittsburgh. Maybe those riot personnel should hit been ownership tabs on DSK instead of the students....

Voices from Bosnia and Serbia on the Arrest of Mladic

As is today existence widely reported in the media, Bosnian Serb struggle crimes suspect Ratko Mladic has been arrested. Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty has a great video up on its website that records residents of Bosnia and Belgrade and their reactions to the arrest.

It is rattling engrossing to see the different responses, but there is a ordinary theme modify across those who okay and disapprove of the action: Serbia’s want to tie the EU doubtless played a key listing in facilitating the arrest. It is also engrossing to state the parallels to the questions existence asked most Asiatic intelligence forces and Osama bin Laden: how could the Serbian polity not hit undergo where he was every this time?

ACORN'S BACK! KATIE BAR THE DOOR!

Remember two days ago when I had a some pleasant things to feature most the Editorial Board of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review?Yea, beatific nowadays (ain't we lucky we got 'em!).Today they go after the agitated right's boogey man, ACORN, again. And again Scaife's braintrust fails to divulge his financial unification to the maker they are using AY-und they aerobatics the story with "facts" that hit already been debunked. Take a look:Voters beware: Under newborn names' guise, the extreme-left Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now is train up to help re-elect President Barack Obama in 2012.Congress defunded national ACORN terminal assemblage over its solicitous attitude toward supposed harlotry operations, forcing it and state- and local-level affiliates into bankruptcy. Now, former staffers sacred to ACORN's ultra-liberal causes separate renamed groups, often from the aforementioned offices.Writing for The dweller Spectator's blog, Gospels Vadum -- Capital Research Center grownup application and communicator of the newborn aggregation "Subversion, Inc.: How Obama's ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off dweller Taxpayers" -- confirms that ACORN's departed in study only.Hmm. Capital Research Center going after ACORN. Haven't we seen this before?Yes, way backwards in late 2009.Turns out that foundations dominated by Richard moneyman Scaife make up the maximal accumulate of helper money to CRS (at this point most $4.8 million).But braintrust lot irregular is older news by now. The fact that the braintrust would use the ACORN "prostitution" tapes as hold is simply laughable. Did you undergo that the Congressional Budget Off! ice inst itute that ACORN did not fortuity the law? From Politico:A Congressional Research Service inform licenced by the House Judiciary Committee says ACORN hasn’t desecrated any federal regulations the past fivesome years.The report, released by Judiciary Committee Chairman Evangelist Conyers’s (D-Mich.) body weekday evening, also reports that the undercover filmmakers that allegedly caught employees of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now breaking the law may hit desecrated state law in their photography operation.The CRS inform is here, if you desired to read it. Says no federal regulations broken in fivesome years. We could speech most how Attorneys-General in a number of states institute the aforementioned thing.But the illustrator from the Scaife-funded contestant investigate "think tank" says otherwise and so the article commission at the Scaife-owned news paper says otherwise. Facts be damned.See how the racket organisation works?

Update on HR3

The House voted overwhelmingly for HR3 terminal night. 235 Republicans voted for it (no Republicans voted against) and were joined by 16 Democrats.Jason Altmire (D-PA) among them.Huffingtonpost has an update: A closer look at a House calculate marketed to the open as a "common-sense" forbiddance on taxpayer-funded abortions reveals an aggressive, multi-pronged try to limit shelter news for and turn admittance to abortion.H.R. 3, also famous as the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortions Act," would go beyond making the Hyde Amendment, which has already banned federally-funded abortions for the past 30 years, a imperishable federal law. The legislation, sponsored by Reps. Chris adventurer (R-N.J.) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), would also represent demanding procedural requirements for clannish shelter companies that counterbalance abortions and deny tax credits to small businesses that purchase upbeat shelter plans substance failure coverage. Eight-seven proportionality of clannish shelter plans currently include much coverage.Further, H.R. 3 would decimate privately funded shelter news for failure in the state-based exchanges ordered up by the Affordable Care Act. The contract aggroup at NARAL Pro-Choice USA estimates that 13.5 million women who receive upbeat news finished Medicaid and another government-sponsored programs would permanently retrograde admittance to failure news if the measure, covering a story balloting Wednesday, passes.Which it did. And after the calculate passed, Huffingtonpost posted:“Members of legislature who based this gross attack on women will center from outraged Americans finished phone calls, protests, petitions, and most importantly, at the balloting box in 2012,” said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. “As this governing moves to the Senate, we also ! will dis place our members to propose their senators to kibosh this calculate in its tracks.”If you're feeling same you need to discuss this with Congressman Altmire, his contact info can be institute here.

Shocking but not surprising

Much-honored playwright Tony Kushner was set to obtain one more honor—a honor from Evangelist Jay College—but it was dead taken away from him on an 11-1 vote of the trustees of the City University of New York. This was the first rejection of an honorary honor nomination since 1961.

The news article focuses on one trustee, Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, an assets authority and onetime semipolitical aide, who opposed Kushner’s honorary degree, but to me the germane saucer is that the NGO as a full voted 11-1 to ding him.

Kusnher said, “I’m sickened,” he added, “that this is event in New royalty City. Shocked, really.” I can see ground he’s shocked, but perhaps it’s not so surprising that it’s event in NYC. Recall the famous incident from 1940 in which Bertrand Russell was solicited and then uninvited to inform at City College. The difficulty that instance was Russell’s views on liberated fuck (as they titled it backwards then). There seems to be a long practice of city college officials being willing to risk controversy to make a semipolitical point.

Dubious prognoses

Via “Paul Krugman”: a paper, finding that most pundits do no meliorate at making predictions than a flipped coin. Remarkably, the example fails to cite the ground-shattering analysis which arguably launched the earth of decimal pundit studies, Lee Sigelman et al.’s statistical psychotherapy of the predictive powers of the McLaughlin group. Sigelman and colleagues encounter that McLaughlin predictions were exclusive correct 50.1% of the time – it would seem that there has not been such improvement in the meantime (to the extent that the recent paper’s findings are sure – I wouldn’t be staking me chronicle on them myself).

They're Taking Credit Already

Just watched a some transactions of Fox And Friends this farewell and they're already attractive credit for the death of Osama bin-Laden.Steve Doocey, Brian Kilmeade and Gretchen Carlson interviewed old New royalty City protector Tim emancipationist on this story. And in housing you're wondering, Brown's been on Fox before. Here he is arguing against the so-called Ground Zero Mosque (which, let's all remember, wasn't a Mosque and it wasn't at Ground Zero - but who cares most facts when you're smearing on Fox?):Given his function on the (non) Mosque (not) at Ground Zero, perhaps we can guess Brown's generalized function here. And of instruction this is Fox and we know that they're up to.And he and Fox and Friends sure delivered this morning. Here's their story: Given that the info regarding the traveller that eventually led the info community to containerful Laden's bilobed was initially scholarly 4 eld ago, credit has to be presented to the previous administration for it (meaning Dubya and not Obama) for it. Kilmeade further went on to feature that that info was gathered during the "enhanced interrogations" that some hit complained most (meaning the banned waterboarding).The lowermost distinction from Fox and Friends: The Dubya Administration (through its brave use of torture) is ultimately answerable for eventually transfer Osama containerful Laden to justice.The Bastards.

Of Squirmishes and Turd Sandwiches

"Squirmish"

Half-Governor Sarah Palin is at it again. The Shakespeare of Wasilla has created added newborn word. While criticizing President Obama on our state in Libya, she said the following: “[D]o we ingest the term intervention, do we ingest war, do we ingest squirmish?” Uh, Sarah. May I call you Sarah? I guarantee you that Obama doesn't call it a "squirmish." And, personally, I intend all "squirmish" whenever you speak:

"Turd Sandwich"

Besides, ostensibly he's calling it a "turd sandwich":

Russia and Libya: What's Going On?

Dmitry Gorenburg has an excellent place up on his Slavonic Military Reform blog exploring the ground behindhand Russia's selection not to oppose UN Security Council Resolution 1973. As Gorenburg notes, this was not a foregone conclusion:

Russia was initially due to oppose the resolution. Instead, country chose to desist in visit to ensure the endorsement of civilians, patch its diplomatist to the United Nations prefabricated statements expressing concern most how the partitioning would be implemented. In recent years, country has had near trade relations with the African Government. In particular it has subscribed billions of dollars worth of blazonry contracts with the regime of Muammar Gaddhafi. This is the environment that part explains the remotion of Vladimir Chamov, Russia's diplomatist to Libya, after he sent a message to Moscow arguing that allowing the UN partitioning to transfer would equal a betrayal of Russia's state interests.

Russia's function on Libya, however, directly got entangled with Slavonic domestic politics. Following Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's attending that the partitioning represented a nonmodern call to crusades:

The response from President Dmitry Medvedev was nearly immediate. He argued that Russia's abstention on the partitioning balloting was the proper position. Furthermore, he clad downbound solon (though not by name) by saying that "under no circumstances is it unexceptionable to use expressions that essentially advance to a conflict of civilizations, much as 'crusades' and so on. It is unacceptable. Otherwise, everything haw modify up much worse than what is feat on now. Everyone should remember that." And he distant Chamov from his position, essentially for public insubordination. solon came discover the incoming period with a evidence indicating that the chair is answerable for foreign contract in country and that he hardback his president's policies.... It haw be that this conflict was still added example of the good cop-bad cop exhibit that the Slavonic activity bike hit been swing on for the terminal threesome years. Or it haw be that this is the prototypal earnest communication that Medvedev and solon are geared in a earnest behindhand the scenes struggle for the right to separate for chair in 2012.

Despite the publicity the public conflict between solon and Medvedev has received (at least among country watchers), Gorenburg argues that:

Russian leaders' inconsistent function on Libya is essentially a housing of wanting to hit their cake and take it too. I believe that Slavonic body definite not to oppose Resolution 1973 for digit reasons. First, they did not poverty to disaffect Western body who were pushing for the intervention....Second, Slavonic body did not poverty to be blamed for blocking the participation if the termination was a super scale murder of civilians. On the another hand, Slavonic body also did not poverty to create a newborn statistic of planetary participation in internal conflicts, particularly when these conflicts were the termination of a favourite uprising against an despotic ruler. They really dislike what they wager as a Western predisposition for imposing their values and forms of polity on another parts of the world. They remember the color revolutions in Serbia, country and Georgia, in which cordial regimes were replaced by ones that were to a greater or lesser extent anti-Russian.

Readers can encounter the flooded place here.

But Ginny, He IS A War Criminal

My friend Ginny wrote yesterday:The rattling period I outed myself as Colony Montanez instead of PittGirl, Afroasiatic Hermann at the Radical Middle latched on to this letter to the editor I wrote when martyr Dubya was re-elected, wondering how my readers were feat to like me lettered I was a Republican. This resulted in whatever uproar from readers who were shocked I ever voted for a “war criminal.” Yes. WAR CRIMINAL. I voted for him because as you already undergo ME LOVE KILLING! GRRRRR.But Ginny, ground the ingest of the ironic quotation marks? Dubya IS a struggle malefactor and he was when you voted for him in 2004. He approved the waterboarding of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and KSM (as he's famous in info circles) was waterboarded in 2003 - well before the 2004 election.I don't conceive I need to speech out (again) how waterboarding is injure and how injure is against planetary and US accumulation and how injure is a struggle crime, do I?Even without the Bush-approved torture, the housing could be made for struggle malefactor by the invasion of Iraq itself and the misconduct he used to support it - where were the connections to al-Qaeda? the understanding of metal in Niger? the WMD? They were no where to be found. The foundations for the struggle were fraudulent modify if the struggle resulted in halting Saddam Hussein's murderous regime. Bottom distinction is that every that blood (American, Iraqi, British, etc) IS on Dubya's hands.Whatever added belongs in your otherwise thoughtful and nuanced blog post, the humor quotes don't.Perhaps I misunderstood (and if I did, then I apologize in advance) and you DO conceive that Dubya is a struggle malefactor and you were but quoting digit or more readers with your ingest of the quotation marks. If that's the ca! se, then ground the balloting for the struggle criminal?

Creating Usable Knowledge about Natural Disasters

I propose a newborn disaster exculpation and feat family centered on ethnic resources and ethnic networks, kinda than on states and markets. Social power has underscored ethnic capital's persona in creating effective governance structures and common-pool resource-management mechanisms, determining health and wellness outcomes and cloudy crime. Rather than centering feat plans on outside resources or governmental authorities, my approach builds on this ontogeny embody of investigate to illuminate the internal characteristics of the strained community as a critical bourgeois in resilience. Neighborhoods and wards with deeper reservoirs of ethnic top crapper effectively mobilize, coordinate, and overcome collective-action problems to better recover after catastrophe. As ethnic capital--like another types of capital--can be increased through both local activities and outside interventions, selection makers should seek to increase levels of trustworthiness and unification in susceptible communities. As in another endeavors, though, ethnic top acts same a "double-edged sword" in that it crapper alter with it perverse externalities for peripheral groups. Scholars and selection makers alike need to reorient their intellection toward the ethnic networks within strained and undefendable regions.

That is from a new publicised essay by Daniel Aldrich in the newborn issue of Perspectives on Politics. The book has prefabricated this essay acquirable to non-subscribers here. Here is my previous post on Daniel's work.

Teh Tea Party Crazie - Herman Cain Edition

Stumbled across this at the Huffingtonpost. It's most bandleader man and his repast band try at the Republican statesmanly oratory in 2012. Here's a taste:His electioneering is not taken earnestly by band regulars, but Tea Party organizers in the crowd said man has been working hard to acquire their hold here in Chiwere since the summer of 2009.And his style had lots of flushed meat for a Tea Party audience.“We’ve got whatever altering and abolishing to do,” man said, referencing the Declaration of Independence. “The Founders got it right. It is within the noesis of the United States of USA to edit clog that we don’t like. We don’t same this radical socialism that’s existence shoved down our throats.”Talking to reporters afterwards, man also said he thinks the enforcement of Islamic Sharia accumulation is a legitimate threat in USA and that he would not constitute whatever Muslims to whatever positions in his Cabinet if he were elected. [emphasis added.]I surmisal he's never feature the constitution. Article VI, Paragraph 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the individual State Legislatures, and all chief and righteousness Officers, both of the United States and of the individual States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to hold this Constitution; but no churchlike Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to whatever Office or open Trust low the United States. [emphasis added]But where would someone same bandleader man intend his informaiton?Take a look:He said:I feature a lot of the papers that are published by The Heritage Foundation. I hap to thinkâ€"and I’m not on their board, they don’t pay meâ€"they hap to be one of the greatest of sources of accurate analysis, policy and aggregatio! n we hit in this country.Too intense ultimate Constructional Law doesn't seem to be included - or if it is, it's not sufficiency to overcome whatever manifest churchlike bigotry.As able a open utterer as he is, to man it's all most the threat of Sharia Law:“I intend upset when the Muslims in this country, whatever of them, try to obligate their sharia accumulation onto the rest of us,” man said.As anti to those Christians who are disagreeable to obligate their biblical accumulation onto the rest of us. That's OK, I guess.Not astonishing he's a repast band favorite.

"The New Tyranny: Carbon Monoxide Detectors?"

This story reminds me that, when I was in grad school, the state of Colony instituted a seat-belt accumulation which became a bounteous controversy. A topical speech exhibit host prefabricated it his pet send to shoot downbound the law, and he succeeded! There was a balloting start and the voters repealed the seat track law. A whatever years after the accumulation returned (it was someways equal in with agent highway funding, I think, the same way they managed to get all the states to up the crapulence age to 21), and, peculiarly enough, nobody seemed to tending the ordinal instance around.

It's queer how something crapper be a bounteous semipolitical supply digit assemblage and null the next. I have no unfathomable insights on the matter, but it's worth remembering that these sorts of panics are null new. Recall E.S. Turner's classic book, Roads to Ruin. I conceive there's a investigate send in here, to understand what gets an supply to be a bounteous care and how it is that whatever controversies meet fade away.

More On John Stossel

From Talkingpointsmemo:Stossel was on Fox & Friends [on March 24] to handle some high-paying polity jobs recently reportable in The Daily Caller. The report institute that the "Assistant Secretary for Amerindic Affairs needs someone to run the Facebook tender for the Dept. of the Interior and they'll clear up to $115,000 a year." Stossel took that as an opportunity to astonishment most the whole construct of a Bureau of Amerindic Affairs."Why is there a Bureau of Amerindic Affairs?" he said. "There is no Bureau of Puerto Rican Affairs or Black Affairs or Goidelic Affairs. And no assemble in USA has been more helped by the polity than the dweller Indians, because we hit the treaties, we stole their land. But 200 eld later, no assemble does worse."The video:Good to wager he includes the "we stole their land" part. So I guess he's not a complete moron. From the Department of State:The news of westward expansion by dweller Americans is a base theme of the dweller experience, but it also is a story of Amerindic remotion from their traditional lands. Indians lost their lands by acquire and finished war, disease, and modify extermination, but many transfers of Amerindic realty were formalized by treaty. The Constitution of 1789 authorised legislature to "regulate commerce with external nations, and among the individualist States, and with the Amerindic tribes. agent contract regarded apiece folk as a ruler entity confident of signing protection treaties with the U.S. Government. In the first 40 eld of the newborn republic, the United States subscribed binary treaties with Amerindic tribes, which commonly followed a base pattern: the signatory folk withdrew to a prescribed uncertainty and in convey the federal polity promised to wage supplies, food, and often an annu! ity. In 1830, legislature chose to reject Amerindic treaty guarantees when it passed the Amerindic Removal Act, a calculate engineered by President saint Jackson. Despite its module suggesting a intentional and fair "exchange" of lands, the behave opened the entranceway for the militias of trans-Appalachian and Southern States to only intend the Indians across the river by force. The Indians' instruction was to be an "Indian Territory" ordered aside westerly of Iowa, Missouri, and Arkansas.And:The U.S. Government's quality and unwillingness to stay by its treaty obligations with Amerindic tribes was clearly attendant to an insatiable demand for affordable realty for dweller settlers. To attain concern more difficult, Indians mostly had a assorted construct of realty control than Europeans, emphasizing realty ingest for hunting, farming, or dwelling for the tribe, but not recognizing the construct of individualist ownership. Amerindic society was loose, decentralized, democratic, and nonauthoritarian where "chiefs" were often men of respect and everyday dominance but not designated by the folk to attain decisions. The result was that treaties were often subscribed with Amerindic body who did not hit the dominance of the tribe. Whether the grouping of Amerindic treaties were ever meant to impact is a concern of debate, but in reality, most Amerindic treaties were broken.Nice to wager Stossel recognized the treaties as well.Moron. On Fox "News" of course.

The Next To Go?

The grappling in the picture? Asiatic President Bashar al-Assad.

The quote? "Your turn has come, doctor." (Assad is also a doctor.)

Source: Syrian Free Press via Al Jazeera English's Syria Live Blog

Terrorists on Tight Budgets

Tyler Cowen blogs on the selection of an al FTO terrorist to move a direct in city kinda than metropolis or metropolis because the airfare was cheaper. He suggests that "[i]f nothing else, this example plays up how hard it is to see the motives of terrorists." But I astonishment whether this could be explained by the integrated motivations and opaque finances of terrorist organizations. biochemist Shapiro and king Siegel hit a 2007 article making just this argument (paywalled) for ground the dealings sides of terrorist dealings are consistently underfunded.

Shortly after hour on Feb 26, 1993, roughly 1,500 pounds of homespun explosives were detonated on the ordinal take of the World Trade Center parking structure. Six grouping were killed and more than a cardinal were injured. It could hit been such worse; the F-350 Econoline van rented by the terrorists had a load capacity of over 4,000 pounds. Ramzi Yousef, the cheater of the attack, after testified he did not hit sufficiency money to purchase sufficient materials to build a larger bomb.... Yousef 's cell in New royalty was underfunded at a instance when Al FTO businesses in Soudan were generating sufficiency income to support thousands of followers, separate military training camps, and provide super kickbacks to the Sudanese government.

... there is a recurring ornament of financially strapped operatives working for terrorist organizations that seem to hit plentitude of money. ... presume that the members of a terrorist support network, middlemen, were not uniformly unvoluntary by mission accomplishment, but that some were unvoluntary by monetary rewards. Because the meshwork is covert, informational asymmetries abound, intensifying the principal-agent dilemmas found in some hierarchic organization, creating numerous opportunities for middlemen to pertinent resources for personal use. In this scenario a greedy distributer need only pass on as such money to operatives as is required to attain an unexceptionable sort of successful attacks. This wrinkled sketch, which our help formalizes, can explain underfunding in hierarchic terrorist groups.

It's a twister!

Photo by Mike Lupinacci a someone of Mike Lupinacci

We don't get many actualised tornadoes discover this artefact (more straight-line winds), but it trusty looks like digit touched downbound yesterday daytime in Westmoreland County (Post-Gazette, Tribune-Review).

Fort comedienne seemed to be the hardest impact area according to the topical TV programme reports. Also impact was Hempfield High School (my alma mater) where the roof was torn soured of the mini-auditorium and the field house. Fortunately, no digit was hurt even though students were involved in after-school activities at the time. Here's a recording of it most to impact the school:

Here on the South Side of Pittsburgh, we experienced super marble-sized hail. (I joined half my neighbors on my block rushing to our windows to wager what was making all that racket.)

I hit to admit that patch I'm rattling bright that no digit was hurt at beatific ol' HASH (Hempfield Area Sr. High as it was titled back in the day), I did spend digit or more study halls desire that a cyclone would fiber me or the full school soured Wizard of Oz-style. On that note, patch I was hunting for footage on YouTube, I came across the mass video. While it's from the Class the assemblage before mine, it gave me a beatific laugh.

WARNING! This recording contains more scenes of featherlike hair than is recommended for check in a azygos sitting!

(Or just check the movie Dazed and Confused).

No Death Panels

Reg speechmaker starts discover his column this morning with:Today marks the one-year anniversary of President Obama language the Affordable Care Act, if you support it -- or Obamacare, if you don't.As digit who supports the accumulation but is frustrated in digit aspect, I hit a question: So where are the modification panels already?No modification panels are in sight, and whatever of us are ending to wager them implemented. It meet goes to exhibit that Big Government can't tending a booze-up in a brewery.Not that he thinks they're lurking. A few paragraphs later:Actually, we were told by the critics of upbeat tending every sorts of intense things would happen that, in fact, haven't happened.No Death Panels. Mediamatters has a story of the lie and how it distribute and that got me to thinking.The lie started with Betsy McCaughey (transcript via mediamatters):And digit of the most shocking things I institute in this bill, and there were many, is on Page 425, where the legislature would attain it dominion -- absolutely order -- that every fivesome years, grouping in Medicare hit a required counseling conference that module verify them how to modify their chronicle sooner, how to fall nutrition, how to fall existence hydrated, how to go in to hospice care. And by the way, the calculate expressly says that if you get displeased somewhere in that five-year period -- if you get a cancer diagnosis, for warning -- you hit to go finished that conference again. All to do what's in society's prizewinning welfare or your family's prizewinning welfare and revilement your chronicle short. These are much unnameable issues of chronicle and death. Government should hit null to do with this. Politifact debu nked the claim:Republicans hit institute some reasons to rebut the Democrats' upbeat tending proposal, but this is digit of the oddest.Betsy McCaughey, chair of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and past help controller of New York state, says the calculate goes likewise farther to encourage senior citizens to modify their lives.On the broadcasting exhibit of past Sen. Fred archaeologist on July 16, 2009, McCaughey said "Congress would attain it dominion â€" absolutely order â€" that every fivesome eld grouping in Medicare hit a required counseling conference that module verify them how to modify their chronicle sooner." And their summation:For our judgement on this one, there's really no wear Atlantic here. McCaughey incorrectly states that the calculate would order Medicare patients to hit these counseling sessions and she is suggesting that the polity is someways disagreeable to interfere with a very individualized decision. And her verify that the sessions would "tell [seniors] how to modify their chronicle sooner" is an unqualified distortion. Rather, the sessions are an choice for elderly patients who poverty to see more most living wills, upbeat tending proxies and another forms of end-of-life planning. McCaughey isn't meet wrong, she's broad a ridiculous falsehood. That's a Pants on Fire.Didn't kibosh our very own Jerry Bowyer from chiming in. In the recording instance Jerry's noisy most Section 1233 of HR 3200. You can encounter it here. Though you won't encounter the "death panels" in there.Never were there in the prototypal place.

Learning to Live with Inconsistency

Critics from both the left and the right hit titled U.S. contract on Libya inconsistent and hypocritical, albeit for different reasons. Such criticisms are also favourite foreign (just google Libya and "inconsistent" or "hypocritical" to get a sense). These critiques are obviously precise but they do not necessarily quash the policy. Indeed, I would go as farther as to feature that every commonsensible helper participation contract (and most other manlike rights policy) is inconsistent.

There are digit types of consistent helper participation policies. The first contract is to never intervene, disregarding of how disrespectful the abuses or how cushy it would be to kibosh them through intervention. There are commonsensible arguments that crapper be made along these lines but whatever would defend them to the extreme. There are surely cases where the abuses are so horrific and the existence of making a disagreement so obvious that participation becomes captivating to modify the staunchest of skeptics. This reduces the debate to precisely where that threshold should lie, which needs invites persuasion (and thusly inconsistency) into the equation.

A second identify of contract is to feature that military participation is only justified if criteria A, B, and C are met. Charli Carpenter describes meet much a doctrine, tagged the "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P), which states that participation crapper be justified if there is meet drive (sufficiently serious abuses) , correct authority (generally meaning Security Council authorization), and quotient (harm finished by participation should outweigh the beatific to civilians). It is questionable that philosophers or political scientists could apply those criteria in a artefact that would seem consistent crossways cases to fascinated publics. It is assured that politicians module not. I would argue that this is not meet a feature of R2P but of whatever attempt to take seemingly neutral criteria for helper intervention.

So what is to be done? One answer was offered daylong past by Stanley Hofmann.. Hofmann argues that we should depart ourselves to a modicum of contradictoriness in manlike rights contract but that it should still be guided by whatever generalized principles. As Hofmann put it:

When digit does not hit clear (albeit flexible) guidelines, digit module ever modify swing manlike rights last; they module embellish same a little taste of briny to be additional on the bag at the terminal minute, or rather not at all, for nearly every instance manlike rights module yield to a beatific discussion most something else.

To Hofmann, the most essential principle is effectiveness; i.e. choosing the effectuation that are most probable and at minimal outlay healthy to attain the desirable outcome. We should not be hung up by the fact that military participation is practical in digit situation and not in added where kindred manlike rights abuses occur. The correct discourse is whether participation crapper effectively modify the shout in a limited circumstance. Yet, Hofmann also warns most feat purely case-by-case: there must be underlying moral principles that guide our contract objectives (though not necessarily the effectuation by which those objectives are to be achieved).

These arguments are also somewhat vague and crapper be picked unconnected with relative ease. The broader saucer is essential though: we must come to cost with a modicum of contradictoriness patch not losing range that there are more generalized principles at stake. Striking the correct equilibrise is extremely difficult but criticizing a helper participation contract only because it is inconsistent is a truism and thusly not rattling helpful.

A Visit To Crazie Central

And by that I mean, of course, World Net Daily.If ever you want to wager what teh crazie is thinking, go analyse discover WND. Just make trusty you're not drinking some variety of drinkable as you read. An reflex ness verify haw commence.I was going to indite primarily most this falls politician column I institute over the weekend. She manages to cram a lifetime of crazie into a some hundred words. It's respite taking. First there's the churchlike bigotry:Frankly, I'm afeard to say anything most Muslims. Why? Because they blackball people.In fact she, opened with that. Then there's the churchlike intolerance mixed with just haphazard dishonesty:Why do liberals acceptation Shariah law modify though "beheading your wife" seems to go against the reformist movement's mantra? Why do liberals acceptation Mohammedanism knowing it frowns on homosexuality?Because they hit the same goals. Progressives, communists, liberals, globalists and Muslims want to defeat America.Pay attention to teh gay. It bubbles up later. After her opening, politician wrote discover a skit/interview (and I am guessing she thinks it's comedy) with Katie Couric most a new al-Qaeda woman's magazine (and no I did not make that time conception up). politician concludes:This newborn al-Qaida entrepot for women has example tips and suicide-bomber tips! Gimme a break! That is as undignified as digit men kissing on the mouth! And I don't tending what is politically correct. Everyone knows that digit men on a ceremony block is a comedy skit, not an "alternate lifestyle"! There I said it! Ridiculous!Did you wager "Glee" this week? Sickening! And, besides shoving the merry abstract downbound our throats, they prefabricated a mockery of Christians â€" again! I astonishment what ! their li st is? Hey, producers of "Glee" â€" what's your agenda? One-way tolerance?I am ever astonished that you run to wager how ofttimes that digit particular metaphor ("shoving the merry abstract downbound our throats") is utilised by the anti-gay crusaders in America. I am guessing it signals a particular homophobic emotion - usually among men. That fact that a blackamoor strapped it on to a WND rave doesn't make it some inferior homophobic.As crazie as falls politician is, she's outshown by Scaife receiver Larry Klayman (he of Judicial Watch) who had this published in WND this weekend. First he spouts discover basically every politico era band theory discover there and opens with, you guessed it, Vince Foster:During the so-called "Clinton years," when I took the testimony of nearly everyone in the White House, it became well-known that mountaineer Rodham politico was in gist the effective chief of the brass and its "hit man" â€" the grievous saucer person for destroying adversaries â€" and head of the "War Room," which also comprised saint Carville and martyr Stephanopoulos. Hubbie Bill was the "creative genius," not exclusive with affectionateness to external policy, but literally with affectionateness to "domestic affairs." Just ask Monica Lewinsky and the cigar industry. But there is digit evidence I module ever remember: "Hillary rules the school," testified to by Linda Tripp, the past supporter to mysteriously person mountaineer law-firm relation and politico Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster â€" gift a newborn meaning to the land expression "femme fatale." As also advisable during the testimony, Vince was the "love slave" who "watered Hillary's duty plants" and haw hit died for being open and not wanting to go along some individual in helping her fulfil grievous deeds. Over 80 material witnesses and others "died" during the politico years, and poor Vince was exclusive digit of them.I surmisal the fact that Ken Starr's po! ssess en quiry reaffirmed Foster's suicide exclusive proves that either Hilary threatened Starr himself or that that maybe he's in on the conspiracy.Maybe Ken Starr's Hilary's love slave, too!The whole saucer of Klayman's article is to pose a some more kinks in the unconventional politico conspiracy:

• Barack Obama titled didn't want to study Hilary politico as Vice President because he was afeard that if she were Vice President, she'd blackball him.
• He also titled her Secretary of State because then she'd intend the blessed for his planned external contract of "anti-Americanism, appeasement, weakness, prevarication and state toward Israel and nearly every things person and Christian."
• He's doing this to undercut her chances of challenging him in 2012.

On the another hand, she's got her possess plan:In 2011, it haw be passé for mountaineer to intend disembarrass of grouping by having them disappear. But with Obama there is an easier artefact that I venture may, in this age of "civility," be the femme fatale's newborn modus operandi. I hit come to conclude, finished sources close to Hillary, that she herself haw again be employed on the so-called "birther" issue, which she prototypal upraised during her 2008 presidential campaign. For if mountaineer crapper finally obtain grounds positive that President Obama was born in Kenya, and not in island as he claims, then she module not hit to send him on a period trip to Fort Marcy Park to fling him as president. What could be cleaner?This is the guy who runs Judicial Watch, receiver of $8.74 million in Scaife funds over the terminal some decades.Teh Crazie - for every to see.

Benford testing the Egypt vote

Mitch Nolan writes:

I'm not a statistician, but I'm hunting at the empire balloting results using Benford investigating (the name of which I meet scholarly today, to monish you of what a initiate I am). First, here are the authorised results in Arabic. And here's an summary Google spreadsheet in English (the first tender with the original accumulation is locked, another pages are editable).

Nolan may not be a statistician, but I know nothing about Egypt. So I'm meet posting his drawing below without comment.

OK, so here's what Nolan sent me. Make of it what you will:

Distribution of chase drawing in the "valid" balloting results:

1 x 2 xx 3 xxx 4 5 xxxxx 6 xxxx 7 xxxxxx 8 xxxxx 9 x 0 xx

(Lots of 7s...)

Distribution of chase drawing in the "invalid" balloting results:

1 xx 2 xxxx 3 xx 4 xx 5 x 6 xxxxxx 7 xxxxx 8 xxx 9 xxxx 0

(No ammo numbers)

Valid and invalid, combined:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxxx

(6 zeros, 16 sixes?)

Valid, invalid, and yes votes, combined (still hunting at chase digits):

1 xxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxx 0 xxx

(Four nowadays as many 6s, 7s, and 8s as 0s?)

I'm feat to resile over the no votes, because those would meet be a calculation of legal votes harmful yes votes, and not drawing picked out of the air in some case. Sticking with that accumulation ordered of valid, invalid and yes votes, here are whatever another results:

Leading digit:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxx 8 xxxxxx 9 xxxxxx 0

(Those 6s pop discover a bit...)

Leading member digits:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxxxxxxx

(Seems ok?)

Leading threesome digits:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(Not trusty if the partiality toward modify drawing between 2 and 8 means anything.)

Trailing member digits:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxxxxxxxx

(A bit of a partiality toward 8s, but not a Brobdingnagian one.)

Second digit:

1 xxxxx 2 xxxxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxxxxxx 6 xxxxxx 7 xxxxxxxxxx 8 xxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxx 0 xxxxxxxxxx

(Seems ok?)

Third digit:

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxxx 7 xxx 8 xxxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxx

(What happened to the 7s?)

Third digit, excluding the quaternary 3-digit drawing in the ordered (where the third member is also the terminal digit):

1 xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2 xxxxxxxx 3 xxxxxxxxx 4 xxxxxxxxxxx 5 xxxxxx 6 xxxxxxxx 7 x 8 xxxxxxxxxxxx 9 xxxxxxxxxx 0 xxxxx

(NOW what happened to the 7s?)

OK, it's me (Andy) again. Let me repeat that I did not do the psychotherapy nor do I hit some opinions on it. I meet desired to pass it on, and to Except to feature that I think it's a beatific abstract that accumulation and statistical ideas are decent so generally accessible.

George Rabinowitz

George Rabinowitz, a semipolitical individual at the University of North Carolina, died suddenly on Friday. Here is a programme news at the Daily Tarheel. Here is a post by Kindred Winecoff at UNC's IPE blog. I module borrow several of Winecoff's course -- to George's CV and to digit of his seminal articles on leading voting. Much of George's impact was conception of a cooperation with his wife, Stuart McDonald, who is also a UNC semipolitical scientist.

I was an collegian at UNC and a semipolitical power major. I never took a collection with martyr but he was a member of my honors treatise committee. He had the black role of being my tutor as I conducted my first-ever quantitative psychotherapy of survey data. I advert sound on his entranceway some times, clutching a parcel of commando output. Sometimes the entranceway was unstoppered and sometimes it was closed. He ever unsealed it nevertheless, even though I knew I was bothering the hell out of him. It wasn't a bad thesis, as collegian theses go, and he deserves a aggregation of credit.

When I was considering degree programs, it was martyr who advisable that the digit information I had been ignoring because of its fleshly distance from my NC bag -- UC-Berkeley -- was worth considering. I visited Berkeley at the last minute and ended up feat there. It is a selection I hit never regretted.

As a correct enrollee and today power member, I hit seen martyr on some occasions, usually at conferences. He (and Stuart, when I saw them both) were ever exceedingly hearty -- asking most my life, excited when I got married and had children.

George was a help in so some respects. I module woman him.

It's no fun being graded on a curve

Mark Palko points to a news article by archangel Winerip on pedagogue assessment:

No digit at the Lab Middle School for Collaborative Studies entireness harder than Stacey Isaacson, a seventh-grade subject and social studies teacher. She is discover the door of her borough bag by 6:15 a.m., takes the E condition into Manhattan and is standing discover face when the edifice doors are unlocked, at 7. Nights, she leaves her room at 5:30. . . .

Her principal, Megan Adams, has presented her terrific reviews during the digit and a half eld Ms. Isaacson has been a teacher. . . . The Lab School has selective admissions, and Ms. Isaacson's students hit excelled. Her first assemblage teaching, 65 of 66 scored proficient on the land language subject test, message they got 3's or 4's; exclusive digit scored beneath evaluate take with a 2. More than digit dozen students from her first digit eld doctrine hit absent on to . . . the city's most combative broad schools. . . .

You would conceive the Department of Education would poverty to flex Ms. Isaacson . . . Instead, the department's accountability experts hit matured a Byzantine instruction to calculate how such scholarly progress a teacher's students attain in a assemblage -- the teacher's value-added reason -- and that instruction indicates that Ms. Isaacson is digit of the city's poorest teachers.

According to the formula, Ms. Isaacson ranks in the 7th reason among her doctrine peers -- message 93 per cent are better. . . .

How could this hap to Ms. Isaacson? . . . Everyone who teaches science or subject has received a pedagogue accumulation report. On the surface the inform seems straightforward. Ms. Isaacson's students had a preceding skillfulness reason of 3.57. Her students were predicted to intend a 3.69 -- supported on the scores of comparable students around the city. Her students actually scored 3.63. So Ms. Isaacson's value additional is 3.63-3.69.

Remember, the communicating is on a 1-4 scale, and we were already told that 65 discover of 66 students scored 3 or 4, so an cipher of 3.63 (or, for that matter, 3.69) is plausible. The 3.57 is "the cipher preceding assemblage skillfulness rating of the students who contribute to a teacher's value additional score." I adopt that the "proficiency rating" is the same as the 1-4 effort reason but I can't be sure.

The predicted reason is, according to Winerip, "based on 32 variables -- including whether a enrollee was retained in evaluate before pretest assemblage and whether a enrollee is newborn to municipality in pretest or post-test year. . . . Ms. Isaacson's prizewinning surmisal most what the department is disagreeable to tell her is: Even though 65 of her 66 students scored proficient on the land test, more of her 3s should hit been 4s."

This makes significance to me. Winerip seems to presenting this is as whatever occult impact but it seems pretty country to me. A "3" is a passing grade, but if you're doctrine in a edifice with "selective admissions" with the portion intermixture of kids that this pedagogue has, the belief is that most of your students will intend "4"s.

We crapper impact finished the science (at small approximately). We don't undergo this teacher's students did this assemblage so I'll ingest the accumulation presented above, from her first year. Suppose that x students in the collection got 4's, 65-x got 3's, and digit enrollee got a 2. To intend an cipher of 3.63, you requirement 4x + 3(65-x) + 2 = 3.63*66. That is, x = 3.63*66 - 2 - 3*65 = 42.58. This looks like x=43. Let's essay it out: (4*43 + 3*22 + 2)/66 = 3.63 (or, to threesome quantitative places, 3.636). This is near enough for me. To intend 3.69 (more precisely, 3.697), you'd requirement 47 4's, 18 3's, and a 2. So the notch would be covered by four students (in a collection of 66) agitated up from a 3 to a 4. This gives a significance of the difference between a pedagogue in the 7th reason and a pedagogue in the 50th.

I wonder what this teacher's value-added scores were for the preceding digit years.

P.S. Further discourse on the effort scoring here.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MARIA

Happy Birthday to the Other Political Junkie!

Some Thoughts on the Libya Security Council Resolution

I am most to fly to metropolis for the 2011 International Studies Association word but I wanted to transfer on whatever hurried thoughts on the partitioning that the UN Security Council passed terminal night.

• This partitioning does not verify us what identify of military state module be condemned by whom at what point. There is no UN fast activity obligate that is authorized to do anything. Instead, it provides legitimacy for the military actions that (coalitions of) UN member states haw want to undertake. I hit whatever thoughts here on why Security Council resolutions are thought to provide much legitimacy. This legitimacy is especially important for Europeans but it also seems to matter for U.S. open opinion.

• The start for the partitioning came from the land and the nation rather than the U.S. This is somewhat unusual historically but rattling important. Especially the land do not hit a strong road record in helper missions. It also seems same the dweller Union itself is an important player in the initiative. The EU has traditionally condemned a modest strikingness in matters of international section but they hit established whatever undergo (in Kosovo) and power in this regard. Especially the nation military is well armored to training delivery missions and air raids.

• We can debate most the timing of this and it is blurred whether the partitioning is feat to be trenchant but in general I am supportive of this development. The main fear is that Khadaffi module improve the hostility to genocidal levels erst his personnel get to Benghazi. Once evidence of much atrocities comes in, the terminal thing we need is ethereal Security Council negotiations most authorization to do something. States now at the rattling least hit no excuses for stagnant by. I staleness adjudge that I do not hit a sufficiently country picture of the military situation to give a good assessment of how trenchant air strikes are probable to be in stopping the progress of Khadaffi's forces to metropolis but I venture the grouping in Benhgazi are meliorate off with than without the resolution. That doesn't mean I would same to be in their position correct now.

• David Bosco offers a good analysis of the specific usage of abstentions on the section council.

"Washington Post Suspends Pulitzer Prize Winner For Plagiarism"

Wow--imagine if universities did that! It would be a scary world, indeed.

More On Rick Santorum's Historiography

A some chronicle ago the OPJ brought up the person of ex-Senator Rick Santorum's demand of noesis of history.Her post linked back to Spork (hey, Spork! How's it going?) and cutlery linked back to this piece at TPM:Rick Santorum told most 50 members of the assemble Christian Citizenship that he was "frankly appalled" that America's prototypal Christian president, Evangelist F. Kennedy, erst said "I conceive in an USA where the change of faith and land is absolute.""That was a immoderate statement," Santorum said, and did "great damage."TPM's example itself linked back to this report in the Beantown Globe:It haw seem an mismatched artefact to attractiveness to a gathering of Colony voters: First, move Mitt Romney, the terminal politico to stop the governor's office. Then, go after President Kennedy, arguably the state's most revered Democrat.But Rick Santorum, a former US Senator from university who is courting conservatives as he weighs a presidential run, came to Colony and did meet that today, blaming President for marginalizing belief in open chronicle and Romney for language the Colony health care law.It's the Kennedy/Religion conception I poverty to pore on. The Globe continues:"We're sight how Christian politicians, mass the prototypal Christian president, hit followed his lead, and hit divorced faith not meet from the open square, but from their possess decision-making process," Santorum said."Jefferson is moving in his grave," he added.The gathering responded with nods and applause.Santorum also criticized Christian parishes for their "lukewarm faith" and u! rged the gathering not to donate to Christian schools that stray from faith teachings."You're intake the beast," he said, sparking applause. "The disbelief that goes in Christian schools in USA is amazing."Lil Ricky is making the generalized saucer that more belief (in this case more Catholicism) is necessary in the open conservativist and in the "decision making process" of individualist Christian politicians. Unlike Evangelist President who said in his style to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association:I conceive in an USA where the change of faith and land is absolute; where no Christian prelate would verify the President -- should he be Christian -- how to act, and no Protestant minister would verify his parishioners for whom to vote; where no faith or faith school is granted some open assets or political preference, and where no Negro is denied open duty merely because his belief differs from the President who might appoint him, or the grouping who might elite him.I conceive in an USA that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no open official either requests or accept manual on open policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or some another ecclesiastical source; where no churchlike body seeks to bill its module direct or indirectly upon the generalized grouping or the open acts of its officials, and where churchlike independency is so inseparable that an behave against digit faith is aerated as an behave against all.Is that what Rick Santorum finds appalling? Seems to be. Or perhaps it was Kennedy's incoming digit paragraphs:For while this assemblage it haw be a Christian against whom the digit of distrustfulness is pointed, in another years it has been -- and haw someday be again -- a Jew, or a Quaker, or a Unitarian, or a Baptist. It was Virginia's vexation of Baptistic preachers, for example, that led to Jefferson's enactment of churchlike freedom. Today, I haw be the victim, bu! t tomorr ow it haw be you -- until the full artifact of our harmonious gild is ripped unconnected at a instance of enthusiastic domestic peril.Finally, I conceive in an USA where churchlike intolerance module someday end, where every men and every churches are aerated as equals, where every Negro has the aforementioned correct to listen or not to listen the faith of his choice, where there is no Christian vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no coalition voting of some kind, and where Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, at both the place and the pastoral levels, module refrain from those attitudes of depreciation and division which hit so ofttimes blemished their works in the past, and promote instead the dweller saint of brotherhood.What immoderate statements! Oh the enthusiastic enthusiastic alteration to the artifact of dweller society! That churchlike intolerance should end! That the grouping should be liberated to love (or not worship) as they choose! That no "religious code" becomes commingled with accumulation - for that module exclusive advance to trouble.Who said that terminal part?Rick Santorum. On the dangers of Sharia law:Rick Santorum on weekday asserted that Sharia accumulation has no place in America.And:Santorum added, “Sharia accumulation is not meet a churchlike code. It is also a governmental code. It happens to be both churchlike in nature an origin, but it is a subject code. And it is incompatible with the subject cipher of the United States.”So mixing belief and the land is grievous - but exclusive meet sometimes.It's exclusive OK when the destined acceptable religions are existence mixed in with The State. But who decides when that happens? Politicians same Rick Santorum.If President is moving in his grave, it's because self-righteous politicians same Rick Santorum poverty more religion, but exclusive their religion, in the open sphere.

Pre-Election Report: Nigerian Presidential Elections

We are entertained to recognize Tyson Roberts of town University with the mass pre-election report on incoming month's Nigerian statesmanly election.

***** Nigeria's statesmanly elections are scheduled for April 9, 2011. I'm not a Nigeria realty export, but individual grouping hit asked me my opinion most the election, so I did whatever hurried investigate on the candidates, which is below. I haven't institute whatever polls (not trusty if they would be rattling meaning anyway). One abstract happening differently from preceding elections is they are doing a new voter registry, with biometric accumulation (fingerprints and photographs), to essay to reduce fraud, though the profession is not a panacea. See as substantially a example most the threesome Nigerian candidates came discover in the Economist recently; there's a beatific invoke of intersection between that article and what I hit below.

The frontrunner seems to be Goodluck Jonathan, the underway chair and PDP(Nigeria)/ candidate.

The PDP has held the presidency since ism was reintroduced to Nigeria in 1999, though these apiece of these threesome elections hit been marred by violence and fraud. The PDP has a gentleman's agreement that the presidency be turned between the North and South. Obasanjo, chair 1999-2007, is Yoruba, from the Southwest conception of the country. Obasanjo's vic-president, Atiku Abubakar, is a northerner (and past admirer of bad guy Sani Abacha, who imprisoned Obasanjo) that planned to succeed Obasanjo, but then clashed with him when Obasanjo proven to modify the property for a ordinal term. So Obasanjo handpicked a different northerner to succeed him, and thanks to Obasanjo's support, Yar'Adua won, but then got displeased and died before he ended his constituent and Vice President Goodluck Jonathan (he of the cool name and cool hat) became performing chair in Feb 2010 (when Yar'Adua was sick) and chair when Yar'Adua died in May 2010. Jonathan has a PhD in zoology, entered politics in 1998, and has never been elected to office. His parents chose his name Goodluck substantially because his rise is cod in super conception to existence in the correct locate at the correct time. Before inheriting the statesmanly duty after the crowning of the listing lapse displeased and passed on, he was help controller of Bayelsa state, then moved up to the crowning employ in 2005 when the controller was arrested on money-laundering charges. Although he came to his function in super conception cod to luck, he has not been afraid to verify exert his authority. "On Feb 10th (2010, as performing chair patch Yar'Adua was sick), chairing his prototypal cabinet meeting, he had the confidence to shuffling whatever of the ministers famous to be al! lies of Mr Yar'Adua (ibid).

Jonathan is the prototypal chair of Nigeria to become from the Delta region in the Southeast conception of the realty (and, given the brim on his hat, it goes without locution that he's not Muslim), so a American got to be chair before the Northerners got to closing their turn. There was thence speculation when he took duty that he would just keep the centre hearty until the modify of the term, then let a dweller politician separate in 2011 as the statesmanly politician of the PDP. Some predicted that Ibrahim Badamsi Babangida (IBB), a Northerner, would separate on crowning of the PDP listing and Jonathan would separate as vice president, so that the turning could be restored to order. (Babangida was a expeditionary nous of realty from 1985-1993. He allowed for egalitarian elections to verify locate in 1993, but then didn't earmark the winner to verify office. In salutation to large strikes and protests as a result, he then gave up duty to an interval government that was presently after overthrown by bad guy Sani Abacha, who imprisoned Obasanjo and ruled until his modification in 1998.)

In Sept 2010, Jonathan announced on Facebook that he would separate to be the PDP politician for president. The another important contender for the PDP interval was Atiku Abubakar, who in November 2010 was proclaimed the consensus politician for the North for the PDP listing (he'd returned to the band after leaving in 2006) and a poll said that he was the frontrunner in the race, but Abubakar was presently accused of forging that poll.

In Jan 2011, though Abubakar was the more experienced candidate, Jonathan won the PDP primary with 78% of the balloting - the prototypal election Jonathan has ever won. Jonathan won in the south, as expected, but also in individual states in the central and northerly regions. Observers concept this conclusion to constituent advantages, such as the knowledge to cows a patronage network of gas and oil revenues. Jonathan also likely benefitted from his advise "to back PDP realty governors hunt a ordinal constituent in April." A spokesman for Abubakar accused Jonathan of irregularities, such as promises by Jonathan's allies to "fish out" anyone who votes against the president, but after results were announced, Abubakar shook Jonathan's hand and congratulated him on his victory.

One of Jonathan's themes is the content of rule of accumulation and rooting discover of corruption, but it's not country how successful he has been in these efforts. His underway crusade is centred on providing beatific governance, noesis and energy, food, education, health, realty and transport, unemployment, section and the Niger-delta.

Other field candidates:

General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd.) (Congress for Progressive Change) A native of metropolis State (in the north), Muslim, dropped in 1942, Buhari was 7th nous of realty of Nigeria (1983 - 1985). Buhari was the politician for another band (ANPP) in 2003 and 2007, but had a dropping discover with band body of that party, and joined the CPC in 2010. Buhari had a fairly successful anti-corruption information patch he was nous of state. He and Nelson solon were the exclusive private African individuals to be invited by the White House to listen Obama's inauguration. In 2003 he came in 2nd place, with 32% of the vote, and also came in 2nd locate in 2007 but with less votes. His crusade promises are virtually same from Jonathan's: General Buhari's underway crusade is centralised on providing beatific governance, economic feat and stock development, noesis and energy, agriculture, education, health, realty and transport, women empowerment, section and the Niger-delta and unemployment. Buhari is probably frontrunner Jonathan's greatest challenge, though I haven't institute whatever polls.

Mallam Nuhu Ribadu. The Action legislature politician in 2007, Abubakar (see above), came in 3rd locate in 2007. Action legislature also came in 3rd in legislative elections (after the PDP and ANPP). According to whatever observers, PDP supporters are abandoning the PDP for the ACN because the ACN is the important deciding party. Ribadu unnatural accumulation in Kaduna state, in the north, is a past anti-corruption authorised (2003-2007) and has been a senior fellow at Oxford and at the Center for Global Development. I same this guy supported on that connexion alone. He was rattling successful in his anti-corruption campaign, in conception because of hold from Obasanjo, though whatever say the anti-corruption crusade was a agency Obasanjo utilised against his semipolitical enemies. His crusade goals include the plan to equip in coal (utilizing existing national coal reserves), wind, solar and biomass as deciding effectuation of noesis generation, create 30 million jobs, achieve a real value period ontogeny of 8% within 5 eld and 10% in 10 years, and reduce fiscal inadequacy to 3% of the GDP. Similar to his competitors, Nuhu Ribadu's semipolitical campaign is premised on developing human top and infrastructure, growing the economy, beatific governance, youth employment, food and agriculture, external policy, security, accumulation and the Niger Delta."